The Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC vs Klipsch Cinema 800 comparison shows that these models have some important differences and common features. The Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC was rated 6.6, while the Klipsch Cinema 800 has a rating 8.2.
Each of the models under consideration has active amplification type. A noticeable difference is the number of channels that Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC has 9.2.4 and Cinema 800 has 3.1. These rivals can be compared in terms of power, 1300 (overall) versus 800 (overall) according to devices. The built-in subwoofer is not implemented in any of these models. An external subwoofer can be connected to any of the units in this comparison. Rate 10 out of 10 received the Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC for audio features and specs, but the Klipsch Cinema 800 received 6 out of 10.
The Cinema 800 can play audio from Spotify.
Wireless Internet connection is realized only in the Cinema 800. Soundbars from this comparison have Bluetooth support. There are 3/1 HDMI inputs/outputs in the Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC versus 2/1 HDMIs in the Klipsch Cinema 800. As in the Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC, so in the Cinema 800 there is the HDMI Audio Return Channel (ARC). Connecting devices via USB is possible in both models. We rated the connectivity of the Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC at 9 out of 10, while the Cinema 800 was rated 8/10.
The manufacturer of the Cinema 800 provides a device control application. The Klipsch Cinema 800 equipped with a microphone. The models under consideration cannot become part of a multiroom system.
Manufacturers equipped both units with Dolby Atmos audio decoder. The Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC can work with surround sound due to DTS:X support. The Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 eARC was rated 10/10, while the Cinema 800 received a mark of 8/10 for multichannel surround.