Samsung HW-Q60T vs Polk Audio Signa S3 review

Votes 1 1
Rating 5 5

Samsung HW-Q60T vs Polk Audio Signa S3 comparison chart

Overall
Samsung HW-Q60T
5.5
Polk Audio Signa S3
6.4
6
9

Samsung HW-Q60T vs Polk Audio Signa S3 review

Samsung HW-Q60T
vs
Polk Audio Signa S3

The Samsung HW-Q60T vs Polk Audio Signa S3 comparison shows that these models have some important differences and common features. The Samsung HW-Q60T was rated 5.5, while the Polk Audio Signa S3 has a rating 6.4. The soundbars are equipped with a different number of buttons, volume down, volume up, power, source for the HW-Q60T and power, source, demo, volume down, volume up for the Signa S3.

Audio features

Each of the models under consideration has active amplification type. A noticeable difference is the number of channels that HW-Q60T has 5.1 and Signa S3 has 2.1. The built-in subwoofer is not implemented in any of these models. An external subwoofer can be connected to any of the units in this comparison. Rate 7 out of 10 received the Samsung HW-Q60T for audio features and specs, but the Polk Audio Signa S3 received 4 out of 10.

Streaming services

The Signa S3 can play audio from Spotify.

Connectivity

Wireless Internet connection is realized only in the Signa S3. Soundbars from this comparison have Bluetooth support. There are 1/1 HDMI inputs/outputs in the Samsung HW-Q60T versus 1/0 HDMIs in the Polk Audio Signa S3. As in the HW-Q60T, so in the Signa S3 there is the HDMI Audio Return Channel (ARC). Connecting devices via USB is possible in both models. We rated the connectivity of the HW-Q60T at 7 out of 10, while the Signa S3 was rated 5/10.

Features

Each of the soundbars can be controlled using the application. The Polk Audio Signa S3 equipped with a microphone. The models under consideration cannot become part of a multiroom system.

Multichannel surround

Dolby Atmos audio decoder support is not implemented in either the HW-Q60T or Signa S3. Devices from this comparison cannot process surround sound due to lack of DTS:X. The HW-Q60T was rated 5/10, while the Signa S3 received a mark of 4/10 for multichannel surround.

Advantages Polk Audio Signa S3 over Samsung HW-Q60T

  • Amazon Music compatible
  • Spotify support
  • WI-FI enabled
  • Microphone
Add soundbar to comparison
We didn't find anything to show here

Common

Product

Samsung HW-Q60T
Polk Audio Signa S3

Model

HW-Q60T
Signa S3

Brand

Samsung
Polk Audio

Reviews

1048
0

General

Placement type

table-top, wall-mountable
table-top, wall-mountable

Connection to source

wired, wireless
wired, wireless

Soundbar buttons

volume down, volume up, power, source
power, source, demo, volume down, volume up

Audio features

Built-in channels

5.1
2.1

Amplification type

active
active

Output power, W

360 (overall)

Separate speaker (in package)

2
0

Separate speaker connections

wireless
has not

Subwoofer

Built-in subwoofer

Separate subwoofer (in package)

Separate subwoofer connections

wireless
wireless

Streaming services

Apple Music (AirPlay)

Amazon Music

Spotify

Other streaming services

has not
Pandora, SoundCloud

Connectivity

WI-FI

Bluetooth

Ethernet (RJ45)

0
0

NFC

HDMI input/output

1/1
1/0

HDMI ARC

HDMI eARC

HDMI CEC

Optical digital input/output

1/0
1/0

USB

1 (USB 2.0)
1 (USB 2.0)

Coaxial digital input/output

0/0
0/0

Analog audio input/output (RCA)

0/0
0/0

Headphone output

0
0

Subwoofer output

0
0

Features

Voice control

App control

Microphone

Remote control

Multi-room

Multichannel surround

Dolby Atmos

Dolby (other)

Dolby Digital
Dolby Digital

DTS:X

DTS (other)

DTS Digital Surround, DTS Virtual:X

User manual

Manual

N/A

Dimensions

Size (Wx H x D), cm/in

96.5 x 5 x 10.1/38.6 x 2.3 x 4.1
89.8x5.6x8.3/35.3x2.1x3.2

Weight, kg/pounds

3.1/7.5
2.9/6

Other

Release year

2020
2020
Samsung HW-Q60T
Polk Audio Signa S3
Samsung HW-Q60T
Polk Audio Signa S3

Soundbars SoundStrokes Art comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 5.5
  • 6.4
  • 5.5Samsung HW-Q60T
  • 6.4Polk Audio Signa S3

Samsung HW-Q60T competitors

Polk Audio Signa S3 competitors