In this article, we will talk about Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 vs Samsung HW-Q900T comparison. Both soundbars received a score of 8.2 in our ranking. The soundbars are equipped with a different number of buttons, power, source, demo, volume down, volume up for the Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 and volume down, volume up, power, source for the HW-Q900T.
Each of the models under consideration has active amplification type. A noticeable difference is the number of channels that Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 has 9.2.4 and HW-Q900T has 7.1.2. These rivals can be compared in terms of power, 1000 (overall) versus 406 (overall) according to devices. The built-in subwoofer is not implemented in any of these models. An external subwoofer can be connected to any of the units in this comparison. Rate 10 out of 10 received the Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 for audio features and specs, but the Samsung HW-Q900T received 8 out of 10.
Soundbars do not have AirPlay support. Each of the competitors can play content from Spotify.
Wireless Internet connection is realized only in the HW-Q900T. Soundbars from this comparison have Bluetooth support. There are 3/1 HDMI inputs/outputs in the Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 versus 2/1 HDMIs in the Samsung HW-Q900T. As in the Shockwafe Ultra 9.2, so in the HW-Q900T there is the HDMI Audio Return Channel (ARC). Connecting devices via USB is possible in both models. The connectivity of each of the models was estimated at 8/10. The manufacturer of the HW-Q900T provides a device control application. The Samsung HW-Q900T equipped with a microphone. The Samsung HW-Q900T may become part of a multiroom system.
Manufacturers equipped both units with Dolby Atmos audio decoder. Units from this comparison can process surround sound due to DTS:X support. The Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 was rated 10/10, while the HW-Q900T received a mark of 9/10 for multichannel surround.
The Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 is better soundbar in this comparison. Check Nakamichi Shockwafe Ultra 9.2 price